Senator Ted Cruz (R-FL) took to the Senate floor at 2:41 PM yesterday to speak against voting for the cloture motion on the House Continuing Resolution legislation (House Res. 59) and did not finish his remarks until 12:00 noon the next day. But detractors like Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) are quick to insist that it was not a filibuster. It is said that the Freshman Senator from Florida could not have a filibuster as his effort was not intended to delay or prevent legislative action.
A broader understanding of filibuster is an effort to prevent action by making a long speech. The 21 hours and 19 minutes of floor time certainly qualifies as a long speech. Consider the aim of Senator Cruz’s effort. He was speaking against a cloture motion. Cloture is the procedure that a 60 vote majority in the Senate cuts off debate.
Those who deny that Senator Cruz’s control of the Senate Floor for nearly a full day was not a filibuster are less interested in abiding by proper political parlance. They know that the public generally considers a filibuster a noble effort of a Senator to abide his conscience and speak what he understands as the truth until he can stand no more. Filibusters evoke memory’s of the Frank Capra film “Mr. Smith Goes to Washington” (1939).
|[L] Frank Capra's Mr. Smith Goes to Washington (1939) [R] Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) during filibuster|
But if Cruz just was giving a very long speech, then he can be framed as just wasting the Senate’s time, even though Majority Leader Reid was appraised and approved of the talkathon.
All of this between-the-beltways trivialities about filibusters illustrates one of Senator Cruz’s concerns. Early on in his filibuster, Senator Cruz alleged that most people don’t give a flying flip about a bunch of politicians in Washington, DC with cheap suits and haircuts. A filibuster may empty the Senate chamber, but it can generate considerable attention and audience via CSPAN as well as alternate media and the internet.
But couching the Senate floor action as a non-filibuster against the cloture vote on the Continuing Resolution (House Res. 59) which it’s technically correct, it is smoke and mirrors to confuse the public of the real work.
The Continuing Resolution is a budget matter. The Senate had not passed a budget in four years, and so Continuing Resolutions which used prior spending levels as a metric for stop gap funding have been used. For Fiscal Year 2014, the Senate had not passed any specific appropriation bills and the October 1st fiscal new year loomed.
So the House of Representatives passed a Continuing Resolution for two months of funding of all federal programs, save the yet to be implemented Obamacare. The White House and Senate Democrats under the direction of Senate Majority Leader Reid want to strip the defund Obamacare provision, which many ayes in the House were premised.
The cloture motion was meant to cut off debate. If passed, Senate rules for budget bills then only allow for 30 hours of debate. Senator Cruz and other tea party sympathetic conservatives were concerned that Senator Reid would present a clean bill, which stripped the defund Obamacare provision and not allow for any amendments.
Cruz’s filibuster sought to educate the public of the Senatorial shenanigans. Cruz alleged that some Republicans wanted to vote for cloture and then vote against final passage. This DC two step allows what detractors call RINOs (Republicans In Name Only) to say that they voted against the bill, but their vote was a purely symbolic measure and the Democrat majority gets its way to continue to impose an overarching takeover of the health care system (aside from Congress and Federal workers, who were extra juridically exempted by President Obama over specific legislative provisions).
Progressive political hacks wrung their hands at Senator Cruz’s speechifying, noting that he was wasting valuable time. Well, then they should be upset at the Majority Leader who blessed the stunt. Perhaps these advocates of efficiency should focus like a laser beam on Senator Reid’s leadership, which has proven incapable of producing on time budgets for the last five years.
|Tx. State Sen. Wendy Davis during her filibuster June 2013|
To echo Hillary Clinton, these Cruz critics decry the “faux" filibuster by effectively saying “What difference, at this point, does it make.” Obamacare is the law of the land, there were not 40 votes to stop the measure and Cruz did not have control of support of the entirety of his own caucus. Those sound like compelling talking points for politicos without principle who care more about being on the winning side than doing the right thing for the American people.
In between renditions of Dr. Seuss’ Green Eggs and Ham for the Cruz childrens’ storytime, there was probably more substantive debate about Obamacare’s adverse effect on the health care delivery system and retarding economic growth during Cruz’ s filibuster than what occurred when the so called Affordable Care Act was passed by the Senate on Christmas Eve, 2009.
The filibuster drew more ordinary people outside of the District of Calamity (sic) to pay attention to detailed arguments against than the sweet lies put forth by the White House and the lapdog Lamestream Media.
While procedurally Senator Cruz's efforts might not amount to much, this is not the only battle to be found in defunding Obamacare. Even if Senator Reid is successful in passing a Continuing Resolution which strips the defund Obamacare provisions through the Senate, the House must act. Either the Republican majority in House must acquiesce to Senator Reid's jam down with a "clean" C.R., the Chambers must conference or the House can pass another legislative vehicle which the Senate may not approve prior to October 1st. There are suggestions that revised House legislation might include a one year delay in Obamacare, revoking the Congressional Obamacare exemption, or approving XL pipeline, which would be a tough pill for Senate Democrats to swallow.
Mr. Smith Goes to Washington illustrated how people in the heartland became engaged in a filibuster by dumping an alluvia of telegrams on the Senate floor. Senator Cruz is hoping that in the internet age, public opinion can be galvanized by social media. C-SPAN allowed for internet 2.0 peer to peer engagement with Cruz reading Twitter messages on the Senate Floor. Cruz is counting on alternate media and social media to work around the Lamestream Media and produce a groundswell of support which changes the static between the beltway certainty that an unpopular, flawed law like Obamare can be ramrodded into implementation.
Senator Cruz's filibuster drew back the curtain on the complacency of the Cocktail Party in both parties between the beltways. The vitriolic reaction that senior Senator John McCain (R-AZ) unleashed against Cruz after stopped speaking reveals his true self. Freshman Senator John Boozman (R-AR) reportedly dressed Cruz down for all the out of state phone calls about Obamacare. And Senate Minority Leader Senator Mitch McConnell (R-KY) refused to support the renegade rhetoric. This internecine sniping prompted former Governor Sarah Palin (R-AK) to note: "We already have three parties: the Liberal Democrats, the RINO Republicans and 'the good guys.' ".
Cruz's marathon speech in the Senate also showed some unity amongst the Young Turks. Senator Mike Lee (R-UT) was instrumental in dissecting the deficiencies and questionable jurisprudential propriety of Obamacare implementation. But what was really impressive was to see how prospective rivals for the 2016 Republican Presidential nomination, namely Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) and Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL), worked together to get the message out about Obamacare and do something, rather than sit back and cast empty symbolic votes.
The nearly day long debate also had a couple of remarkable colloquies with "friends" on the other side of the aisle. A late night discourse between Senator Cruz and Senator Tim Kaine (D-VA) showed collegiality and some measure of cooperation on solving Obamacare problems in the future.
Majority Whip Senator Dick Durbin (D-IL) tried two tactics. In the evening, Durbin's disparaging dialog that a man educated at that nation's best school should know how to count to sixty (referring to the cloture mark) seemed aimed straight for MSNBC video "drop ins". In the morning, Durbin returned to argue the same sob story using an airplane analogy. Even though Cruz had been on his feet for 18 hours, Cruz used the airplane analogy as a means to show that Congress gets first class medical care with their exemption while little people get less under Obamacare.
As the Noon hour approached, Senator Cruz offered Majority Leader Reid several unanimous consent proposals to speed up the deliberation process. Majority Leader Reid tried to take Cruz's remaining time away from him by procedure. Later Reid wanted to ask a question which was more of lambasting argument, which Cruz withdrew his time.
Finally, Democrat Majority Leader urged Cruz to give up 15 minutes of time to Senator John McCain. It's a good thing that Cruz did not accede to the latter demand to someone who called him a wacko-bird, as McCain inveighed on his "friend" Cruz.
In trying to generate groundswell support in the grassroots, Senator Cruz's filibuster popularized the mantra "Make DC Listen". This slogan may energize the Tea Party Caucus, possibly be the touchstone of a third party or a Presidential campaign. Nevertheless, "Make DC Listen" taps into public discontent and shows social media savvy.
So even though Senator Cruz was not successful in his immediate tactic to prevent cloture on the C.R., we ought to give a flying flip about his filibuster as it may be a harbinger for real change in the District of Calamity (sic).